Suzana markovic biography of christopher
This paper describes contemporary changes in marriage, relationships and family in European populations, and then their evolution from the last decade of the twentieth century till present day, as well as various forms and types, in which plurality of contemporary partnership unions is revealed. The other goal of this supplement was to provide a wider theoretical-hypothetical, explanatory framework for understand-ing what is happening in population (on appearance level) but now in the context of contemporary societies. Three variables are introduced: macro (paradigm of modernization, namely social, i.e structural and cultural changes), micro (paradigm: resources-limitations-behavior) and mezzo (differences in social and demographic development of countries of North, Western, South and Central and Eastern Europe (former socialistic countries in transition).
Cautious predictions on what could be expected in future concerning: empirical documented differences of living arrangements of European populations of the West, but also of the East, as well as relative demographic consequences. On the macro level (paradigm structure/culture) the responses depend on the rate the two main social processes will develop: 1) development of "European society", and 2) the birth of "world" (global) society. Most of the authors conclude on the convergence of social and demographic development on the territory of Western, but not Eastern Europe (and especially the Balkans). This conclusion concerns even the countries of the South European region, considering that it is uncertain in which direction and speed will their integration into the European Union develop.
With regards to the trend of decreasing fertility, a continuance of existing secular tendencies may be expected in future as well, even on the whole European territory, and that it will be supported by social changes of (post) modernization, individualization and rational behavior, so that it will become a general model
Suzana Markovic Krstic - Mehanicko Kretanje Stanovnistva - Migracije Stanovnistva, Teorije I Cinioci - 177-185
Suzana Markovic Krstic - Mehanicko Kretanje Stanovnistva - Migracije Stanovnistva, Teorije I Cinioci - 177-185
Copyright:
Available Formats
Original Title
Copyright
Available Formats
Share this document
Share or Embed Document
Did you find this document useful?
Is this content inappropriate?
Copyright:
Available Formats
Copyright:
Available Formats
Marković Cabinet
Government of Montenegro
The Marković Cabinet was the 41st cabinet of Montenegro. It was led by Prime MinisterDuško Marković. It was elected on 28 November 2016 by a majority vote in the Parliament of Montenegro. The coalition government was composed of the Democratic Party of Socialists, the Social Democrats, and ethnic minority parties. The cabinet lasted until 4 December 2020, when it was succeeded by the Krivokapić Cabinet, and was the last cabinet of the era of DPS dominance, which lasted from the introduction of the multi-party system in SR Montenegro.
Government formation
2016 election
Main article: 2016 Montenegrin parliamentary election
Parliamentary elections were held in Montenegro on October 16, 2016 and resulted in another victory for the long-ruling Democratic Party of Socialists.
Forming the majority
Although DPS failed to win a majority on their own, they succeeded in remaining in power once again, forming a government with the newly formed Social Democrats (SD), as well as parties representing Albanian, Bosniak and Croat minorities.
On 9 November 2016, Deputy PMDuško Marković was nominated as prime minister by PresidentFilip Vujanović. On 28 November, the government was elected by 42 out of 81 members of the parliament. The entire opposition boycotted the assembly.
| Investiture votes for Marković Cabinet | ||
| Ballot → | 28 November 2016 | |
|---|---|---|
| Required majority → | 41 out of 81 | |
Cabinet composition
Party breakdown
Ministers
Controversy and affairs
In its political rights and civil liberties worldwide report in May 2020, Freedom House marked Montenegro as a hybrid regime rather than a democracy because of declining standards in governance, justice, elections and media freedom. Freedom House stated that years of increasing state capture, abuse of power, authoritative and populist leadership had tipped country over the edge, and for the first time since 2003, Mont .