William james biography summary graphic organizer
William James' Arguments on Religious experience
Is it possible to gain real and valuable knowledge without using reason? Many would scoff at this notion. If an idea cant be defended on rational grounds, it is either a personal preference that may not be held by others or it is false and irrational. Even if one acknowledges a role for intuition in human knowledge, how can one trust another persons intuition if that person does not provide reasons for his or her beliefs?
In order to address this issue, lets first define reason. The Encyclopedia Britannica defines reason as the faculty or process of drawing logical inferences, that is, the act of developing conclusions through logic. Britannica adds, Reason is in opposition to sensation, perception, feeling, desire, as the faculty . . . by which fundamental truths are intuitively apprehended. The New World Encyclopedia defines reason as the ability to form and operate upon concepts in abstraction, in accordance with rationality and logic. Wikipedia states: Reason is the capacity of consciously making sense of things, applying logic, and adapting or justifying practices, institutions, and beliefs based on new or existing information.
Fundamental to all these definitions is the idea that knowledge must be based on explicit concepts and statements, in the form of words, symbols, or mathematics. Since human language is often ambiguous, with different definitions for the same word (I could not even find a single, widely-accepted definition of reason in standard reference texts), many intellectuals have believed that mathematics, science, and symbolic logic are the primary means of acquiring the most certain knowledge.
However, there are types of knowledge not based on reason. These types of knowledge are difficult or impossible to express in explicit concepts and statements, but we know that they are types of knowledge because they lead to successful outcomes. In these cases, we dont know how exactly a succe "The narrative of the DVD was written and is presented by John J. McDermott of Texas A&M University, leading scholar of the history of American philosophy and of the work of William James. The narrative is clearly written and engagingly presented, and it provides an excellent introduction both to James’s life and to James’s study of psychology. Throughout the film, McDermott is attentive to James’s balancing of psychology’s ability to provide a theoretical account of the human animal’s basic workings and its ability to provide practical possibilities for the construction of our own personal and social lives." - Douglas R. Anderson, Ph.D. “William James: The Psychology of Possibility” packs substantive considerations of the great thinker’s work in psychology and his focus on experience. John J. McDermott, the preeminent James scholar of our time, leads the viewer not only through important concepts but also through the context in which those concepts arose within James himself. If this were not enough to make for edifying material, the film goes further, in true Jamesian fashion, to discuss and demonstrate the practical usefulness of those concepts—how they affect experience, attitudes, and behaviors. His work in psychology permeates the many other disciplines in which James partook—philosophy, religious philosophy, even proto-sociology. But this film, goes further, rightly placing his psychology front-and-center, not only in the relation to his own work but to the history of psychology itself. We should all look forward to the next natural step: a film focused up James’s philosophy of radical empiricism and pragmatism." --D. Micah Hester, PhD .William James: The Psychology of Possibility With John J. McDermott, Ph.D.
Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
Former Editer of The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society and Journal of Speculative Philosophy.Review 2
President (), William James Society
Co-author (with Rob Talisse) of On J